Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated that in the mental health domain, experience does not always lead to better diagnostic decisions, suggesting that in clinical psychology experience-based intuition might actually not improve performance. The aim of the current study was to investigate differences in preferred reasoning styles of novice and experienced clinical psychologists as possible explanation of this surprising phenomenon. We investigated clinical and control decisions of novice (n = 20) and experienced (n = 20) clinical psychologists as well as age-matched controls (n = 20 and n = 20 respectively) by using vignettes and MouselabWeb matrices. We assessed their reasoning style preferences by using the Rational-Experiential Inventory (Pacini & Epstein, 1999). Results showed that experienced and novice clinical psychologists did not differ in diagnostic accuracy and that experienced psychologists had a higher preference for rational thinking than novices. We also found that in experienced psychologists a stronger preference for deliberation was associated with greater accuracy, and in novice psychologists a stronger preference for intuitive reasoning was associated with less accurate decisions. It might be that it is not a question of more experience but of deliberation about the task that could help clinicians perform more accurately.
Highlights
We found that in experienced psychologists a stronger preference for deliberation was associated with greater accuracy, and in novice psychologists a stronger preference for intuitive reasoning was associated with less accurate decisions
This study investigated the association between thinking style preferences and accuracy of psychodiagnostic classifications made by novice and experienced clinical psychologists
The results of the current study indicate that a preference for deliberative thinking is associated with better clinical decision-making, but only for experienced clinical psychologists
Summary
While it is self-evident that clinical psychologists who have worked longer in the field gain more experience, it has been shown that they do not necessarily gain more expertise in psychodiagnostic decision-making (Spengler et al, 2009; Vollmer et al, 2013): Even after years of experience, clinical psychologists are relatively poor at categorizing mental disorders into DSM categories (Brailey et al, 2001; Schulte-Mecklenbeck et al, 2015) and make judgments strikingly similar to those of novices (e.g., Ægisdóttir et al, 2006; Garb, 1998; Strasser & Gruber, 2004; Witteman & Van den Bercken, 2007).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.