Abstract
This article offers a critical analysis of collaborative water governance initiatives in New Zealand that is embedded in deliberative democratic theory. The article begins with a review of the scientific and political dimensions of the country’s water quality issues. The authors then discuss collaborative governance initiatives in the Canterbury region and freshwater co-management initiatives between the Crown and Maori, the indigenous people of New Zealand. The article relates these two sets of collaborative practices linked to water policies to deliberative democracy and shows how a systemic approach to deliberation and the implementation of mini-publics could mitigate some shortcomings of collaborative water governance initiatives in New Zealand, both the problems of “wallpaper” democracy, in which the public’s engagement is relegated to superficial decisions, and the power imbalance between elites and the general public in collaborative decision-making processes. The model may also apply to other water governance efforts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
