Abstract

Abstract Theories of deliberative democracy are demanding and set high standards for participants. While these standards are difficult enough to fulfill in a small scale setting, such as a citizen jury, this article will consider what role (if any) the media might play in making elections more deliberative. There are a number of challenges in attempting to apply standards of deliberation to the media coverage of elections. First are the problems of scale. National elections seek to maximize participation and, even with high quality media coverage, not every voter can be expected to act like an ideal deliberator. Secondly, elections tend to be viewed as aggregative processes rather than sites for deliberation. Election coverage will also tend to focus on strategic frames. Thirdly, the mass media are subject to constraints of their own, such as time and the need to attract a large audience. Consequently, there seems to be little realistic prospect of getting the media to meet the full standards of deliberat...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call