Abstract

BackgroundRecent data from genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis indicate that the human genome is divided into conserved megabase-sized self-interacting regions called topological domains. These topological domains form the regulatory backbone of the genome and are separated by regulatory boundary elements or barriers. Copy-number variations can potentially alter the topological domain architecture by deleting or duplicating the barriers and thereby allowing enhancers from neighboring domains to ectopically activate genes causing misexpression and disease, a mutational mechanism that has recently been termed enhancer adoption.ResultsWe use the Human Phenotype Ontology database to relate the phenotypes of 922 deletion cases recorded in the DECIPHER database to monogenic diseases associated with genes in or adjacent to the deletions. We identify combinations of tissue-specific enhancers and genes adjacent to the deletion and associated with phenotypes in the corresponding tissue, whereby the phenotype matched that observed in the deletion. We compare this computationally with a gene-dosage pathomechanism that attempts to explain the deletion phenotype based on haploinsufficiency of genes located within the deletions. Up to 11.8% of the deletions could be best explained by enhancer adoption or a combination of enhancer adoption and gene-dosage effects.ConclusionsOur results suggest that enhancer adoption caused by deletions of regulatory boundaries may contribute to a substantial minority of copy-number variation phenotypes and should thus be taken into account in their medical interpretation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0423-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Recent data from genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis indicate that the human genome is divided into conserved megabase-sized self-interacting regions called topological domains

  • In this work, we present a computational analysis of the hypothesis that the disruption of topological domain boundary (TDB) regions may contribute to or even be the major factor of the phenotypes observed in a subset of copy-number variation/variant (CNV) disorders

  • We developed an analysis strategy that relates the phenotypic features of the CNV disorders to the locations of genes and TDBs within and near to the CNV as well as the phenotypic features of monogenic disorders affecting these genes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent data from genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis indicate that the human genome is divided into conserved megabase-sized self-interacting regions called topological domains. These topological domains form the regulatory backbone of the genome and are separated by regulatory boundary elements or barriers. Alteration of gene dosage by deletion or duplication or by disruption of genes located at the boundaries of CNVs represents a plausible pathomechanism for many phenotypic abnormalities seen in CNV disorders Structural variations such as CNVs, inversions or translocations can change the regulatory context of genes, thereby disturbing the delicate balance between enhancers, silencers and insulators by interfering with the complex chromosomal looping and interaction mechanisms of promoters and one or more cis-regulatory elements. The role of these architectural proteins in TDBs in vertebrates is currently being investigated

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.