Abstract

Amelogenesis features two major developmental stages—secretory and maturation. During maturation stage, hydroxyapatite deposition and matrix turnover require delicate pH regulatory mechanisms mediated by multiple ion transporters. Several members of the Slc26 gene family (Slc26a1, Slc26a3, Slc26a4, Slc26a6, and Slc26a7), which exhibit bicarbonate transport activities, have been suggested by previous studies to be involved in maturation-stage amelogenesis, especially the key process of pH regulation. However, details regarding the functional role of these genes in enamel formation are yet to be clarified, as none of the separate mutant animal lines demonstrates any discernible enamel defects. Continuing with our previous investigation of Slc26a1−/− and Slc26a7−/− animal models, we generated a double-mutant animal line with the absence of both Slc26a1 and Slc26a7. We showed in the present study that the double-mutant enamel density was significantly lower in the regions that represent late maturation-, maturation- and secretory-stage enamel development in wild-type mandibular incisors. However, the “maturation” and “secretory” enamel microstructures in double-mutant animals resembled those observed in wild-type secretory and/or pre-secretory stages. Elemental composition analysis revealed a lack of mineral deposition and an accumulation of carbon and chloride in double-mutant enamel. Deletion of Slc26a1 and Slc26a7 did not affect the stage-specific morphology of the enamel organ. Finally, compensatory expression of pH regulator genes and ion transporters was detected in maturation-stage enamel organs of double-mutant animals when compared to wild-type. Combined with the findings from our previous study, these data indicate the involvement of SLC26A1and SLC26A7 as key ion transporters in the pH regulatory network during enamel maturation.

Highlights

  • Acid-base balance is one of the major essential processes during amelogenesis (Simmer and Fincham, 1995; Smith et al, 1996; Smith and Nanci, 1996; Lacruz et al, 2010a, 2012b), and it has been suggested that fluctuations in extracellular pH level during maturation-stage enamel development are essential for mineral growth (Simmer and Fincham, 1995)

  • Slc26a1+/− mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and Slc26a7+/− mice were a kind gift from Dr Manoocher Soleimani (Xu et al, 2009; Dawson et al, 2010)

  • SLC26A1 and SLC26A7 Do Not Colocalize in Maturation-Stage Ameloblasts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acid-base balance is one of the major essential processes during amelogenesis (Simmer and Fincham, 1995; Smith et al, 1996; Smith and Nanci, 1996; Lacruz et al, 2010a, 2012b), and it has been suggested that fluctuations in extracellular pH level during maturation-stage enamel development are essential for mineral growth (Simmer and Fincham, 1995). Based on our previous study and those of Bronckers et al, Slc26a1/Sat, Slc26a3/Dra, Slc26a4/pendrin, Slc26a6/Pat and Slc26a7/Sut are immunolocalized in secretory- and maturationstage ameloblasts (Bronckers et al, 2011; Jalali et al, 2015; Yin et al, 2015) These genes mainly localize to the apical membrane/subapical vesicles of maturation ameloblast. The expression of Slc26a1, Slc26a6, and Slc26a7 is significantly upregulated at both RNA and protein levels during maturation stage compared to secretory stage (Yin et al, 2014, 2015) These are strong indications of the functional involvement of the Slc gene family in pH regulation during amelogenesis. The deletion of these genes individually fails to induce any abnormal enamel phenotypes, likely due to the compensatory expression of other pH regulatory genes and Slc26a isoforms, suggesting a yet-to-be-identified master pH response regulatory mechanism in amelogenesis (Bronckers et al, 2011; Jalali et al, 2015; Yin et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call