Abstract

Animal coordinated movement interactions are commonly explained by assuming unspecified social forces of attraction, repulsion and alignment with parameters drawn from observed movement data. Here we propose and test a biologically realistic and quantifiable biosonar movement interaction mechanism for echolocating bats based on spatial perceptual bias, i.e. actual sound field, a reaction delay, and observed motor constraints in speed and acceleration. We found that foraging pairs of bats flying over a water surface swapped leader-follower roles and performed chases or coordinated manoeuvres by copying the heading a nearby individual has had up to 500 ms earlier. Our proposed mechanism based on the interplay between sensory-motor constraints and delayed alignment was able to recreate the observed spatial actor-reactor patterns. Remarkably, when we varied model parameters (response delay, hearing threshold and echolocation directionality) beyond those observed in nature, the spatio-temporal interaction patterns created by the model only recreated the observed interactions, i.e. chases, and best matched the observed spatial patterns for just those response delays, hearing thresholds and echolocation directionalities found to be used by bats. This supports the validity of our sensory ecology approach of movement coordination, where interacting bats localise each other by active echolocation rather than eavesdropping.

Highlights

  • Group movement patterns are dependent on perceptual inputs, governed by cognitive mechanisms, and constrained by the motor abilities of the interacting agents [1,2,3,4]

  • Collective movements of flocking birds or shoaling fish are amongst the most fascinating natural phenomena, and everyone has experienced the challenges of walking through a moving crowd

  • We introduce and test the biosonar movement interaction (BSMI) hypothesis, whereby bats interact with conspecifics, to perform coordinated flight, based on the information collected by their biosonar and not by eavesdropping

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Group movement patterns are dependent on perceptual inputs, governed by cognitive mechanisms, and constrained by the motor abilities of the interacting agents [1,2,3,4]. Current collective movement interpretations acknowledge such delays [6,7,8,9], but to explain observed patterns the existence of generic, albeit plausible, interaction rules are postulated. Since individual decisions depend on the information about the actions of other conspecifics [10,11,12,13,14] and movement response are shaped by an animal’s sensory-motor abilities, it is biologically most realistic to explain interaction exclusively from perception biases and delayed responses without inferring social forces from the observed movements. Experiments on saithe (Pollachius virens) pointed to the importance of the use of lateral line compared to vision on school structure and dynamics [21]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call