Abstract

Undergraduate students read two 225-word narrative passages and were asked to recall one immediately and both, unexpectedly, after 7 days. Delaying recall reduced the verbatim recall component substantially, whilst leaving less accurate material relatively unaffected, and even after 7 days some verbatim information persisted in the absence of rote learning. These findings suggest that verbatim recall may be qualitatively different from the recall of gist.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call