Abstract

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for many cancers, including metastatic melanoma, but have also opened the door for a diverse variety of immune-related adverse effects.Case presentationWe describe the first reported case of presumed neurosarcoidosis as an immune-related adverse effect that developed nearly a year after discontinuation of treatment with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab for recurrent metastatic melanoma. The patient was noted to develop clinical signs consistent with systemic sarcoidosis shortly after the initiation of treatment and underwent a biopsy of hilar lymphadenopathy that confirmed sarcoidosis and after which immunotherapy was discontinued. His melanoma remained stable on surveillance imaging for the next year after which time he developed neurological symptoms and was found to have MRI brain abnormalities without evidence of intracranial metastatic disease, consistent with probable neurosarcoidosis given biopsy-proven systemic sarcoidosis and lack of evidence of CNS infection or malignancy. He underwent treatment with high dose steroids, followed by infliximab, and then methotrexate with both clinical and radiographic improvement within 4 months of starting treatment.ConclusionsImmune-related adverse effects often occur within 3–6 months of receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, with some reports of late toxicity. This report highlights a case of probable neurosarcoidosis nearly a year after discontinuation of immune checkpoint therapy. The potential for durable responses after discontinuation of therapy also likely underscores a potential for late toxicity. In patients presenting with new or unexplained symptoms after checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the index of suspicion for an immune-related adverse effect should remain high, irrespective of timing.

Highlights

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for many cancers, including metastatic melanoma, but have opened the door for a diverse variety of immune-related adverse effects.Case presentation: We describe the first reported case of presumed neurosarcoidosis as an immune-related adverse effect that developed nearly a year after discontinuation of treatment with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab for recurrent metastatic melanoma

  • Immune-related adverse effects often occur within 3–6 months of receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, with some reports of late toxicity

  • This report highlights a case of probable neurosarcoidosis nearly a year after discontinuation of immune checkpoint therapy

Read more

Summary

Conclusions

Most IRAE develop within 6 months of receiving their immunotherapy, though the timing is variable This patient did not develop symptoms concerning for CNS involvement until nearly 11 months after the administration of two courses of ipilimumab-nivolumab therapy, after fully recovering from prior IRAE. His suspected neurosarcoidosis continued to show progression even several months after diagnosis despite initiation of steroids. This case should raise awareness that serious IRAE may still develop long after the administration of immunotherapy. Author details 1Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27701, USA. Author details 1Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27701, USA. 2Department of Neuroradiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27701, USA. 3Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27701, USA

Background
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.