Abstract

Objective: Advances in neonatal care lead to an increased survival rate of critically ill babies. Infantile tracheostomies are not uncommon. However, only a few studies have addressed the effect of infant tracheostomy on early motor function. By comparing the scores of the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM) on head control and rolling of infants with and without tracheostomies, the authors aimed to evaluate the effect of infant tracheostomy on early motor development.Methods: Medical records and the GMFM of subjects were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-three infants with tracheostomies and 132 infants without tracheostomies were matched by gestational age, birth weight, and corrected age when the GMFM was performed using propensity score matching. GMFM scores in head control and rolling in different positions were compared by using generalized estimating equation (GEE).Results: Infants with tracheostomy showed lower values for head control in the supine position and in the pull to sit maneuver in multivariate GEE (p = 0.008, 0.004, respectively). However, the results of head control in a prone position and head lift while the examiner held the thorax showed no difference between the groups. Rolling from prone to supine was delayed in the infants with tracheostomy (p = 0.002), while rolling from supine to prone was not delayed compared to the non-tracheostomized group. More than half (54%) of the tracheostomy group scored better in rolling from a prone to supine position than in head control in supine position, which was a higher ratio compared to the non-tracheostomy group (p = 0.00).Conclusions: Tracheostomy seems to influence early motor development in infants. In particular, head control skills related to neck flexor muscle activation and rolling from prone to supine were delayed. Interventions may be required to facilitate these activities.

Highlights

  • Due to advances in preterm neonatal care, the survival rate of very premature and low birth weight infants has increased [1,2,3,4]

  • There was no difference between the study and control group in basal characteristics except the existence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (p = 0.025, Table 1)

  • Indications of tracheostomy are shown in the tracheostomy group (Supplementary Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to advances in preterm neonatal care, the survival rate of very premature and low birth weight infants has increased [1,2,3,4]. Care of critically ill babies with congenital anomalies has greatly improved [5]. This in turn has led to an increased rate of tracheostomies in infants [1, 4]. Tracheostomies in infants are known to reduce the need for a long period of intubation, thereby reducing any risks of tracheal stenosis. It is thought to be associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes [7, 8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call