Abstract

The present study examined whether acute, nonperforated appendicitis is a surgical emergency requiring immediate intervention or a disease that can be treated with a semielective operation. Immediate appendectomy has been the gold standard in the treatment of acute appendicitis because of the risk of pathologic progression. However, this time-honored practice has been recently challenged by studies suggesting that appendectomies can be elective in some cases and still result in positive outcomes. This was a retrospective study using the charts of patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute, nonperforated appendicitis between January 2007 and February 2012. Patients were divided into 2 groups for comparison: an immediate group (those who were moved to an operating room within 12 hours after hospital arrival) and a delayed group (those within 12 to 24 hours after hospital arrival). The end points were conversion rate, operative time, perforation rate, complication rate, readmission rate, length of hospital stay, and medical costs. Of 1805 patients, 1342 (74.3%) underwent immediate operation within 12 hours after hospital arrival, whereas 463 (25.7%) underwent delayed operation within 12 to 24 hours. There were no significant differences in open conversion, operative time, perforation, postoperative complications, and readmission between the 2 groups. Length of hospital stay was significantly greater (3.7 ± 1.7 days) and medical costs were also greater [$2346.30 ± $735.30 (US dollars)] in the delayed group than in the immediate group [3.1 ± 1.9 days; P = 0.000 and $2257.80 ± $723.80 (US dollars); P = 0.026]. Delayed appendectomy is safe for patients with acute nonperforated appendicitis.

Highlights

  • The present study examined whether acute, nonperforated appendicitis is a surgical emergency requiring immediate intervention or a disease that can be treated with a semielective operation

  • The sensitivity of computed tomography (CT; probability of patients diagnosed with nonperforated appendicitis by CT among those diagnosed with nonperforated appendicitis by pathology) was 97.0% (879/906) and specificity of CT was 46.1% (125/271) in our data (Table 4)

  • The false-positive rate of CT was as high as 53.9% (146/271)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present study examined whether acute, nonperforated appendicitis is a surgical emergency requiring immediate intervention or a disease that can be treated with a semielective operation. Immediate appendectomy has been the gold standard in the treatment of acute appendicitis because of the risk of pathologic progression This time-honored practice has been recently challenged by studies suggesting that appendectomies can be elective in some cases and still result in positive outcomes. Some studies have challenged the impact of these delays and standard of care with appendectomy by suggesting that acute appendicitis can either be treated medically[2,3] or operated on electively without increasing morbidity.[4,5,6,7] Given these considerations, we used electronic medical records to review 1805 cases of appendectomy for acute appendicitis between January 2007 and February 2012 to verify whether acute nonperforated appendicitis necessitates immediate intervention or can be treated with a semielective operation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call