Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) remains the only curative option for patients with β thalassemia major (TM). Graft rejection has been a major problem in this group of patients. The increased risk of graft rejection has often been attributed to the number of blood transfusions that these patients are exposed to. However, the published data is confusing with one large series suggesting that patients who had >100 transfusion pre-SCT had a significantly lower risk of graft rejection (Blood 1996; 87: 2082). It is also generally accepted that in patients with thalassemia intermedia the risk of alloimmunisation (red cell) is reduced if transfusion is initiated <12 months of age (Vox Sang 1990; 58:50). We undertook a retrospective analysis to study the impact of age at first transfusion on graft rejection among patients with TM who received an allogeneic SCT at our center.From October, 1991 to April, 2013, 400 HLA matched related transplants for TM was done at our center. The median age was 8 years (range: 1-24) and there were 250 (62.5%) males. 154 (38.5%) were Lucarelli Class II and 229 (57.2%) were in the Class III risk group. Majority (72%) received a busulfan based conditioning regimen while 22% received a treosulfan based regimen. Bone marrow was the source of stem cells in 81% and PBSC in the rest. Majority of the patients received a CSA plus short course methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis regimen. There were 11 (2.8%) early regimen related toxicity (RRT) deaths prior to day 12 and these were excluded for analysis of graft rejection. Of the remaining 389 cases there were 48 (12.3%) graft rejections. Among these 26 (54%) were primary graft failures while 22 (46%) were secondary graft failures. The median time to a secondary graft failure was 122 days (range: 40 - 2210). The median age at first transfusion in this cohort was 6 months (range: 1-66; data not available in 10). The median number of blood transfusions prior to SCT was 85 (range: 4 – 450).Table 1 summarizes the comparison between the group of patients who rejected there graft versus those that did not after excluding early pre-engraftment RRT deaths. After excluding early RRT deaths the EFS and OS of the entire cohort was 70±2.5% and 77±2.2% respectively. Figure 1 illustrates the age at first transfusion between the two groups. On a univariate cox regression analysis the variables that impacted graft rejection significantly were donor age (P=0.000), liver size (P=0.007) and increased age at first blood transfusion (P=0.035). The total number of transfusions prior to SCT was not significantly associated with graft rejection (P=0.894). On a multivariate analysis only liver size (P=0.019) and age at first transfusion (P=0.022) retained their statistically significant adverse effect.Table 1Baseline characteristics and comparison of patients that had a graft rejection versus those that did not after excluding early regimen related toxicity deaths (< day 12).Had graft rejection N (%) / Mean±SD/ Median(Range)Did not have graft rejection N (%) / Mean±SD/ Median(Range)Cox regressionUnivariate analysisCox regressionMultivariate analysisN48341P-valueP-valueAge (years)8 (2-19)7 (1-24)NSSex: M28 (58.3)217 (63.6)NSClass III32 (66.7)187 (54.8)NSLive size (cm)4 (1-14)3 (0-12)0.0060.019Female donor to male recipient15 (31.2)126 (37)NSSplenectomy8 (16.7)35 (10.3)0.083Age at first transfusion (months)10.5±13.47.7±6.70.0360.022Total number of transfusions prior to SCT100 (6-373)85 (4-450)NSConditioning regimen--NSBusulfan based32 (80)246 (76.2)Treosulfan based8 (20)77 (23.8)Stem cell source--NSBM44 (91.7)272 (79.8)PBSC4 (8.3)69 (20.2)CD34 cell dose9.6 (2.35-15)9 (2 – 30)NS [Display omitted] In conclusion, delay in the onset of transfusion in patients with β thalassemia major undergoing a HLA matched related allogeneic SCT probably has a greater adverse effect on engraftment than the total number of transfusions prior to SCT. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.