Abstract

Abstract. Domain filling, forward trajectory calculations are used to examine the global dehydration processes that control stratospheric water vapor. As with most Lagrangian models of this type, water vapor is instantaneously removed from the parcel to keep the relative humidity (RH) with respect to ice from exceeding saturation or a specified super-saturation value. We also test a simple parameterization of stratospheric convective moistening through ice lofting and the effect of gravity waves as a mechanism that can augment dehydration. Comparing diabatic and kinematic trajectories driven by the MERRA reanalysis, we find that, unlike the results from Liu et al. (2010), the additional transport due to the vertical velocity "noise" in the kinematic calculation creates too dry a stratosphere and a too diffuse a water-vapor tape recorder signal compared observations. We also show that the kinematically driven parcels are more likely to encounter the coldest tropopause temperatures than the diabatic trajectories. The diabatic simulations produce stratospheric water vapor mixing ratios close to that observed by Aura's Microwave Limb Sounder and are consistent with the MERRA tropical tropopause temperature biases. Convective moistening, which will increase stratospheric HDO, also increases stratospheric water vapor while the addition of parameterized gravity waves does the opposite. We find that while the Tropical West Pacific is the dominant dehydration location, but dehydration over Tropical South America is also important. Antarctica makes a small contribution to the overall stratospheric water vapor budget as well by releasing very dry air into the Southern Hemisphere stratosphere following the break up of the winter vortex.

Highlights

  • The precise mechanism that controls stratospheric water vapor has been studied for more than 60 yr – since the publication of Brewer’s seminal paper (Brewer, 1949)

  • We vary the amount of super-saturation, the presence of convective moistening (CM), gravity waves (GW) and the transport scheme (K for kinematic or D for diabatic)

  • This paper describes initial results from a domain filling, forward trajectory model that has been developed to examine the dehydration processes that control stratospheric water vapor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The precise mechanism that controls stratospheric water vapor has been studied for more than 60 yr – since the publication of Brewer’s seminal paper (Brewer, 1949). Lagrangian back-trajectory calculations are one of the important tools used to understand this issue These calculations use analyzed winds and large-scale temperatures and are able to accurately reproduce many of the details of TTL dehydration process and lower stratospheric water vapor (e.g., Fueglistaler et al, 2005; Jensen and Pfister, 2004; Gettelman et al, 2002). Liu et al (2010) performed an extensive study of stratospheric dehydration using domain filling back trajectory calculations comparing both diabatic and kinematic trajectory schemes and found that the choice of trajectory transport scheme had significant impact on the water vapor field as will be discussed further below.

Dynamics
Water vapor and dehydration
Convective moistening
Gravity waves
Stratospheric water sources
Results
Parcel distribution
Water vapor
Location of final dehydration events
Summary and conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.