Abstract

The key comparison (KC) studies of the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance—Metrology in Chemistry help ensure the reliability of chemical and biochemical measurements relevant to international trade and environmental-, health-, and safety-related decision making. The traditional final evaluation of each measurement result reported by a KC participant is a “degree of equivalence” (DEq) that quantitatively specifies how consistent each individual result is relative to a reference value. Recognizing the impossibility of conducting separate KCs for all important analytes in all important sample matrices at all important analyte levels, emphasis is now shifting to documenting broadly applicable critical or “core” measurement competencies elicited through a series of studies. To better accomplish the necessary synthesis of results, data analysis and display tools must be developed for objectively and quantitatively combining individual DEqs. The information detailed in the 11 KCs of primary method pH measurements publically available as of 2013 provides an excellent “best case” prototype for such analysis. We here propose tools that enable documenting the expected primary pH measurement performance of individual participants between pH 1 and pH 11 and from 15 °C to 37 °C. These tools may prove useful for other areas where the uncertainty of measurement is a predictable function of the measured quantity, such as the stable gases. That results for relatively simple measurement processes can be combined using relatively simple analysis and display methods does not ensure that similarly meaningful summaries can be devised for less well understood and controlled systems, but it provides the incentive to attempt to do so.

Highlights

  • The Comite International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM) is responsible for the conduct of international key comparison (KC) studies that enable national metrology institutes (NMIs) and related organizations to document measurement capabilities relevant to international trade and environmental, health, and safety-related decision making

  • The traditional final evaluation of each measurement result reported by a KC participant is a ‘‘degree of equivalence’’ (DEq) that quantitatively specifies how consistent each individual result is relative to a reference value

  • The CIPM MRA states that (1) KCs lead to reference values, (2) a key comparison reference value (KCRV) is expected to be a good indicator of an international system of units (SI) value, (3) DEqs refer to the degree to which a national measurement standard is consistent with the KCRV, and (4) DEqs for measurement standards are expressed quantitatively by the deviation from the KCRV and the uncertainty of this deviation at a 95 % level of confidence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Comite International des Poids et Mesures (CIPM) is responsible for the conduct of international key comparison (KC) studies that enable national metrology institutes (NMIs) and related organizations to document measurement capabilities relevant to international trade and environmental-, health-, and safety-related decision making.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call