Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the sociability rating of children, their behavior during dyadic problem solving, and their subsequent level of individual performance. First, 200 children were assessed for their degree of sociability and their skill level on two spatial tasks. Eighty were then chosen to form 20 dyads of sociable children and 20 dyads of not-so-sociable children. The dyads were made up of two low-ability subjects (same-ability dyads) or one high-ability subject and one low-ability subject (mixed-ability dyads). It was hypothesized (1) that the sociable children would initiate collaboration more readily than the not-so-sociable ones, while the latter would exhibit more individualistic behaviors than the former, and (2) that sociable partner collaboration would help the sociable lowability children to progress significantly more than the not-so-sociable ones. The first hypothesis was validated. However, while the second hypothesis turned out to be true for the mixed-ability dyads, the not-so-sociable subjects in the same-ability dyads progressed as much as the sociable ones. This result is discussed in terms of multiple ways of processing.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call