Abstract

Different routes towards canonical formulation of a classical theory result in different canonically equivalent Hamiltonians, while their quantum counterparts are related through appropriate unitary transformation. However, for higher-order theory of gravity although two Hamiltonians emerging from the same action differing by total derivative terms are related through canonical transformation, the difference transpires while attempting canonical quantization, which is predominant in non-minimally coupled higher-order theory of gravity. We follow Dirac’s constraint analysis to formulate phase-space structures, in the presence (case-I) and absence (case-II) of total derivative terms. While the coupling parameter plays no significant role as such for case-I, quantization depends on its form explicitly in case-II, and as a result unitary transformation relating the two is not unique. We also find certain mathematical inconsistencies in case-I, for modified Gauss–Bonnet-Dilatonic coupled action, in particular. Thus, we conclude that total derivative terms indeed play a major role in the quantum domain and should be taken care of a-priori, for consistency.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.