Definitive fusions are better than growing rod procedures for juvenile patients with cerebral palsy and scoliosis: a prospective comparative cohort study.

Abstract

This study compared the outcomes of juvenile patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion (SF) versus growing rod (GR) surgery. Two prospective multicenter registries were queried for patients 8-10years old with minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent SF or GR surgery (no MCGR). Demographics, radiographs, complications, and outcome scores were recorded. There were 35 patients in the SF and 15 in the GR group. The mean age at surgery was 10 and 9.3years in the SF and GR groups, respectively (p = 0.004). In the SF group preoperatively, the major curve measured 86° and 80° in the GR group (p = 0.40). "Definitive" surgery in the GR group consisted of SF in 10, implant retention in three, and implant removal in two. The SF group had 60.8% and the GR group had 45.0% correction following "definitive" surgery (p = 0.03). In the SF group, 8 patients and in the GR group, 9 patients (SF = 22.9%, GR = 60.0%) had a complication (p = 0.01). In the SF group, two patients (5.7%) had reoperations for infection; eight patients (53.3%) in the GR group had reoperations for infection and implant complications (p < 0.001). In the SF group, 23/30 parents (76.6%) noted that the child's life "improved a lot." In the GR group, 3/6 parents (50.0%) noted they were "neutral" about their child's ability to do things, 2/6 (33.3%) were "very dissatisfied." SF treatment for juvenile patients with CP and scoliosis resulted in fewer complications and unplanned reoperations and better radiographic outcomes compared with GR. Quality of life improvements were also better in the SF group. Level III.