Abstract
H.L.A. Hart's Concept of Law has had perhaps most profound effect this century on development of legal theory, laying foundation for a theoretical construct that has become effectively the modern juristic orthodoxy. Robert Moles's book sets out to radically reinterpret Hart's thesis and Positivist tradition. He argues that Harts's analysis is fundamentally flawed and, setting himself against a formalistic position shows how social, historical and intellectual contexts must play a fundamental part in legal understanding and justification. The author's conclusions have major implications for modern judicial law-making and legal codification by freeing them from bonds of Hart's rule-centred concept. Legal theorists; political and social theorists; philosophers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
