Abstract
This study seeks to explore the discrepancies in grammatical judgments between native English speakers and Korean EFL learners when it comes to definite and indefinite NPs in existential there-constructions (ETCs). The experimental results indicate that Korean EFL learners do not exhibit the definiteness effect observed in native speakers. In the experiment, while native English speakers consistently distinguished between definite and indefinite NPs in ETCs, Korean EFL learners displayed varied grammatical judgments, especially concerning definite NPs. Diesing’s (1992) mapping hypothesis provides the theoretical foundation for the constraint that definite NPs are not allowed in ETCs. According to her theory, indefinite NPs simply introduce variables rather than bearing quantificational force on their own, and these variables are bound by existential closure in the domain vP, yielding an existential reading.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Convergence English Language & Literature Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
