Abstract

Once internalized, receptors reach the sorting endosome and are either targeted for degradation or recycled to the plasma membrane, a process mediated at least in part by tubular recycling endosomes (TREs). TREs may be efficient for sorting owing to the ratio of large surface membrane area to luminal volume; following receptor segregation, TRE fission likely releases receptor-laden tubules and vesicles for recycling. Despite the importance of TRE networks for recycling, these unique structures remain poorly understood, and unresolved questions relate to their lipid and protein composition and biogenesis. Our previous studies have depicted the endocytic protein MICAL-L1 as an essential TRE constituent, and newer studies show a similar localization for the GTP-binding protein Rab10. We demonstrate that TREs are enriched in both phosphatidic acid (PA) and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2), supporting the idea of MICAL-L1 recruitment by PA and Rab10 recruitment via PI(4,5)P2. Using siRNA knock-down, we demonstrate that Rab10-marked TREs remain prominent in cells upon MICAL-L1 or Syndapin2 depletion. However, depletion of Rab10 or its interaction partner, EHBP1, led to loss of MICAL-L1-marked TREs. We next used phospholipase D inhibitors to decrease PA synthesis, acutely disrupt TREs, and enable monitoring of TRE regeneration after inhibitor washout. Rab10 depletion prevented TRE regeneration, whereas MICAL-L1 knock-down did not. It is surprising that EHBP1 depletion did not affect TRE regeneration under these conditions. Overall, our study supports a primary role for Rab10 and the requirement for PA and PI(4,5)P2 in TRE biogenesis and regeneration, with Rab10 likely linking the sorting endosome to motor proteins and the microtubule network.

Highlights

  • A limitation of these studies was the small number of proteins that serve as markers for the tubular recycling endosome (TRE); with only MICALL1 and Syndapin2 serving as key TRE markers, it was not possible to determine if TREs can be generated in their absence

  • The Rab10 overlap with MICAL-L1 was considerably lower, likely resulting from the more intense overall Rab10 staining pattern that includes nontubular endosomes in addition to the TREs

  • Our data support the notion that Rab10 and MICAL-L1 coexist on the same array of TRE

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Given the recent study suggesting potential overlap between TREs containing Rab10 and TREs containing MICAL-L1 [26], we sought to determine whether these two proteins mark the same tubular endosomes in a quantifiable manner. In Mock-treated cells, MICAL-L1 and Rab10 displayed a partial overlap on the same TREs (Fig. 3, A–C).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call