Abstract

Metastatic breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that presents in varying forms, and a growing number of therapeutic options makes it difficult to determine the best choice in each particular situation. When selecting a systemic treatment, it is important to consider the medication administered in the previous stages, such as acquired resistance, type of progression, time to relapse, tumor aggressiveness, age, comorbidities, pre- and post-menopausal status, and patient preferences. Moreover, tumor genomic signatures can identify different subtypes, which can be used to create patient profiles and design specific therapies. However, there is no consensus regarding the best treatment sequence for each subgroup of patients. During the SABCC Congress of 2014, specialized breast cancer oncologists from referral hospitals in Europe met to define patient profiles and to determine specific treatment sequences for each one. Conclusions were then debated in a final meeting in which a relative degree of consensus for each treatment sequence was established. Four patient profiles were defined according to established breast cancer phenotypes: pre-menopausal patients with luminal subtype, post-menopausal patients with luminal subtype, patients with triple-negative subtype, and patients with HER2-positive subtype. A treatment sequence was then defined, consisting of hormonal therapy with tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, fulvestrant, and mTOR inhibitors for pre- and post-menopausal patients; a chemotherapy sequence for the first, second, and further lines for luminal and triple-negative patients; and an optimal sequence for treatment with new antiHER2 therapies. Finally, a document detailing all treatment sequences, that had the agreement of all the oncologists, was drawn up as a guideline and advocacy tool for professionals treating patients with this disease.

Highlights

  • The annual incidence of breast cancer in Spain is around 27,000 cases [1], and it causes more than 6200 deaths per year [1, 2]

  • If the patient responded to the first-line treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, fulvestrant is recommended as the second line, or in the absence of symptoms of visceral disease, another option is the combination of exemestane and everolimus, which improves progression-free survival (PFS) [17, 21] (ESMO Categories of Evidence and Consensus: IA) (SEOM level of certainty: high; strength of recommendation: A)

  • [52] If the patient relapses within the first 6 months after completing the trastuzumab adjuvant treatment, the first-line treatment with T-DM1 is recommended, since it has shown a median PFS and overall survival (OS) of 15.2–29.8 months, respectively, and appears to be less toxic than lapatinib combined with capecitabine [39, 53] (SEOM level of certainty: moderate; strength of recommendation: B)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The annual incidence of breast cancer in Spain is around 27,000 cases [1], and it causes more than 6200 deaths per year [1, 2]. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC), in particular, is a disease that varies widely, depending on the site of metastasis and its aggressiveness It may present de novo (6–10 % of breast cancers) or it may appear as recurrent disease (20–50 % of patients) [3]. A patient with a HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive tumor could be treated in the first line with several hormone treatments and with different chemotherapy drugs, such as taxanes, anthracyclines, vinorelbine, or capecitabine in combination with bevacizumab [5, 7, 8] This wide spectrum, ideal for individualized treatment, can be counterproductive in terms of the uncertainty it generates.

Methodology
Conclusion
Findings
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call