Defining the Framework: The Theoretical Context

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter delineates the frame of reference of the book, exploring the role of public open space within the narrative of separation and defining the theoretical context is being taken into account. The chapter is essentially divided in two parts. Firstly, the dichotomic approach between developed and developing counties is replaced by the analysis of the cities of Africa. Telescopic narratives, such as global cities and megacities, are substituted by alternatives narratives (ordinarilyy, worlding and lived cities). Secondly, the chapter defines public space in South Africa, its role and its potential for the urban poor and suggests the use of the rights-based, upgrading and urban acupuncture approaches. The rhetoric of public space usually refers to inclusion and a place of social coexistence and integration. Theoretical references about the concept of public space in South Africa show that the reality of contemporary cities differ from this rhetoric. This paradox will be challenged in this chapter: the practice of building public space will be examined with the aim of evaluating the contrast between policy—or rhetoric—and architectural practice.