Abstract

A new classifi cation system compliant with the EU's Water Framework Directive (WFD) was employed to assess the ecological status of six small forest lakes differently affected by catchment forestry. The classifi ca- tion is based on metrics involving four biological quality elements (phytoplankton, aquatic macrophytes, benthic macroinvertebrates and fi sh) and their nationally defi ned reference and class boundary values. The classifi cation evidence obtained from single metrics and quality elements, on the principle, which establishes status according to the weakest measure, was compared with the integrated classifi cation system used in the Finnish national status assessments. The national classifi cation system harmonizes the individual measures by scoring and expresses overall status class as a median score across quality elements. In addition, because the amount of refer- ence data for this lake type was limited, palaeolimnological analyses were conducted to determine lake-specifi c changes during past decades. The results demonstrated that individual metrics and quality elements may result in highly variable classifi cations, and consequently pessimistic ecological estimates, if the One-out, All-out principle is applied. It is concluded that the integration of evidence from multiple quality elements evens out their variability and results in more realistic status assessments in small humic boreal forest lakes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call