Abstract

Characterizing disease relationships is essential to biomedical research to understand disease etiology and improve clinical decision-making. Measurements of distance between disease pairs enable valuable research tasks, such as subgrouping patients and identifying common time courses of disease onset. Distance metrics developed in prior work focused on smaller, targeted disease sets. Distance metrics covering all diseases have not yet been defined, which limits the applications to a broader disease spectrum. Our current study defines disease distances for all disease pairs within the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10), the diagnostic classification system universally used in electronic health records. Our proposed distance is computed based on a biomedical ontology, SNOMED CT (Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine, Clinical Terms), which can also be viewed as a structured knowledge graph. We compared the knowledge graph-based metric to three other distance metrics based on the hierarchical structure of ICD, clinical comorbidity, and genetic correlation, to evaluate how each may capture similar or unique aspects of disease relationships. We show that our knowledge graph-based distance metric captures known phenotypic, clinical, and molecular characteristics at a finer granularity than the other three. With the continued growth of using electronic health records data for research, we believe that our distance metric will play an important role in subgrouping patients for precision health, and enabling individualized disease prevention and treatments.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call