Abstract

Defining Risk

Highlights

  • The response to Jeffrey Levinton's letter (28 Mar., p. 1490) is really quite simple and empirical. He says that punctuated equilibrium is a slogan

  • The test of a good scientific theory is its utility in fostering fruitful empirical research

  • I have the, perhaps naive, faith that my colleagues in paleontology know the diJfcrencc between science and propaganda. They have tested the theory of punctuated equilibrium, obtaining volumnious and rigorous results both pro and con

Read more

Summary

Powered by the California Digital Library University of California

The response to Jeffrey Levinton's letter (28 Mar., p. 1490) is really quite simple and empirical. I have the, perhaps naive, faith that my colleagues in paleontology know the diJfcrencc between science and propaganda. They have tested the theory of punctuated equilibrium, obtaining volumnious and rigorous results both pro and con. My pleasure in the utility of puncruated equilibrium centers firmly upon its role in fostering (for its test) a decade of direct and careful work on rates and patterns of evolution in fossil lineages (2). Lcvinton, who began his career as a paleontologist, might care to have a look back. We arc a magnanimous lot, and gladly greet our prodigal sons

Defining Risk
Overhead Costs on Research Grants
JOSEPH ARDITTI
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.