Defining Racial Imbalance in Public Educational Institutions

Abstract

1 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483 (1954); 349 U.S. 294 (1955). 2 See United States Office of Education, Equality of Educational Opportunity (Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office. 1966), and the three studies b the United States Common on Civil Rights, Civil Rights U.S.A.: Public Schools C& and West (Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1962); Buffalo (1963); and Report, 2 (1961), d 7; see also Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives, Hearings on De Facto Segregation in Chicago's Public 89th Cong. 1st. sess. (Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1965); Massachusetts Advisory Cdnmittee on Imbalance and Education, Because It Is Right Educationally (Boston: State Board of Education, 1965); Hubert Humphrey, ed., Desegregation: Documents and Commentaries (New York: Crowell, 1964); Owne M. Fiss, Racial Inbalance in the Public Schools: the Constitutional Concents, Harvard Law Review, LXXVIII (January, 1965); Symposium: De Facto Segregation, Western Reserve Law Review, XVII (May, 1965), 475; R. A. Sedler, School Segregation in the North and West, St. Louis University Law Journal, VII (Sparng, 1963), 228; Report of the Arthur Garfield Hays Conference: Northern Segregation a Panel, Howard Law Journal X (Fall, 1964), 127; Robert F. Drinan, Racially Balanced Schools: Psychological and Legal Aspects,. Catholic Lawyer, XI (Winter, 1965), XVI; Note, Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools, Vanderbilt Law Review, XVIII (June, 1965), XVIII; Note, Constitutionality of De Facto Segregation, North Dakota Law Review, XLI (March, 1965), p. 346; Harvard Graduate of Education, Schools for Hartford (Cambridge: Brown must bear much of the blame for