Abstract

This paper centres on the question as to what constitutes “good policing? Four approaches to defining good policing are identified; the objectives, professional ethics, generic competency and interactionist. It is argued that these are differentiated by the extent to which they concentrate on either instrumental and technical dimensions of policing or the social political impact of its outcomes. Through a detailed examination of one incident of routine policing, the authors argue that any analysis which separates technical questions about means from moral questions about ends will remain partial. Finally, it is argued that the development of good policing is a personal achievement on the part of officers and can only be systematically developed if the organisation creates the “ethical space” to allow officers to critically reflect on practice.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.