Abstract
ABSTRACT One of the first decisions to be made when building a mineral resource model is the definition of geological/geostatistical domains. Cluster analysis is a set of techniques in machine learning that can be especially suited for this matter. In order to compare different approaches, two clustering algorithms were investigated in this study: k-means and the dual-space clustering algorithm. Choosing the most appropriate method and the number of clusters can be challenging and some metrics are needed to support these decisions, including the validation of the spatial distribution of the clusters, which is not always appropriately discussed in the literature. We introduce the use of correlograms of the indicators for that matter. Although clustering techniques can be robust for an application in resource modelling, expert knowledge is still necessary when applying cluster analysis to resource modeling, since final decisions should not be based solely on statistical indexes, but also on experience. In this paper, the proposed methodology was tested in a three-dimensional dataset related to a phosphate/titanium deposit.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
