Abstract

Although there have been frequent warnings in the methodology literature about the serious problems which are entailed in accepting null hypotheses, empirical research often reveals a casual acceptance of null hypotheses simply because the obtained differences are not statistically significant. The present article examines this disparity between the methodology and the empirical research literature in order to suggest a specific cause for it in the training programs for psychological researchers. The analysis indicates that the training programs have concentrated on inculcating rules and narrow methods of hypothesis testing, without a proper emphasis on the comprehensive evaluation of all information, as demanded by modern views of the scientific method. The significance test is only one part of the multifarious scientific process for confirming hypotheses and theories.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.