Abstract
An experimental study of defense mechanisms encounters a number of difficulties both in defining the phenomena and in the attempt to diagnose them. Psychoanalysis (Sjöbäck, 1973) is the principal context in which they are studied, but even in psychoanalytic theory there are different interpretations of both the concept of defense mechanisms and their specific expressions or varieties (Brenner, 1974, 1975). Moreover, the variance in their interpretation increases as notions of defense mechanisms evolve. For example, Vaillant (1971, 1976) provides a broad conception of defense mechanisms that includes quite complex types of activity, such as those that determine a person's social adaptation and lifestyle. At the other end of the scale, we have a narrow definition of defense mechanisms as intrapsychic phenomena directly responsible for the regulation of emotions of just one specific modality (Plutchik, Kellerman, & Conte, 1979; Kellerman, 1980). This poses the problem of how to conceptualize the processes designated as defense mechanisms.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
