Abstract

To understand how variation in warning displays evolves and is maintained, we need to understand not only how perceivers of these traits select color and toxicity but also the sources of the genetic and phenotypic variation exposed to selection by them. We studied these aspects in the wood tiger moth Arctia plantaginis, which has two locally co-occurring male color morphs in Europe: yellow and white. When threatened, both morphs produce defensive secretions from their abdomen and from thoracic glands. Abdominal fluid has shown to be more important against invertebrate predators than avian predators, and the defensive secretion of the yellow morph is more effective against ants. Here, we focused on the morph-linked reproductive costs of secretion of the abdominal fluid and quantified the proportion of phenotypic and genetic variation in it. We hypothesized that, if yellow males pay higher reproductive costs for their more effective aposematic display, the subsequent higher mating success of white males could offer one explanation for the maintenance of the polymorphism. We first found that the heritable variation in the quantity of abdominal secretion was very low (h2 = 0.006) and the quantity of defensive secretion was not dependent on the male morph. Second, deploying the abdominal defensive secretion decreased the reproductive output of both color morphs equally. This suggests that potential costs of pigment production and chemical defense against invertebrates are not linked in A. plantaginis. Furthermore, our results indicate that environmentally induced variation in chemical defense can alter an individual’s fitness significantly.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIndividuals possess secondary defenses, such as toxins, coupled with warning signals

  • In aposematic prey species, individuals possess secondary defenses, such as toxins, coupled with warning signals

  • Whereas avian predators are likely to be deterred by aposematic coloration, the strength of chemical or physical defenses can be more important against nonvisual predators, such as ants (Codella and Raffa 1995; Dyer 1995; Sugiura and Yamazaki 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individuals possess secondary defenses, such as toxins, coupled with warning signals. Warning signals are often in the form of conspicuous coloration, which advertises those defenses to potential predators (Ruxton et al 2004). Depending on the perceivers of these traits, their relative importance can vary, resulting in variation in aposematic coloration and secondary defenses (Bowers and Stamp 1997; Endler and Mappes 2004; Nokelainen et al 2014; Briolat et al 2018). The mechanisms behind unprofitability (e.g., distastefulness and toxicity) can vary, resulting in different levels of protection within and among chemically defended species that share a similar appearance (Skelhorn and Rowe 2010; Holen 2013; Winters et al 2018)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call