Abstract
ABSTRACT This note welcomes the judgment in ZXC and in particular the humane and nuanced recognition of reality. The general public do not draw the technical distinctions that professionals and carefully guided juries do on the presumption of innocence. The extension of anonymity until charge is a welcome outcome. The note also considers the taxonomy of the area, responding to the note by Tom Bennett in this volume. It suggests that the ‘hippogriffian’ aspects of the tort of MPI can be explained and justified with a little work.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
