Abstract
Brain opioidergic mechanisms participate in the regulation of motivational and ingestive behaviours. Since alcohol is believed to activate endogenous opioid systems and to produce opioid-mediated antinociception, the present experiments were performed to find out if alcohol-induced antinociception differs between the alcohol-preferring AA and alcohol-avoiding ANA rat lines. Alcohol doses relevant to the voluntary alcohol intake by the AA rats (0.5-1.0 g/kg, intraperitoneally) failed to alter tail-flick (TF) latency in a 55 degrees C water bath by either rat line. However, repeated measurement of TF latency, even without any alcohol treatment, prolonged tail-flick latencies in AA but not in ANA rats. Prolongation of TF latency was also seen in non-selected Wistar rats, indicating that the ANA rats respond abnormally in this test. The antinociceptive effects of swimming-induced stress (3 min at 15 degrees C) and those of cumulative morphine administration (0.5-16.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) were similar in both rat lines. Using higher, motor-impairing alcohol doses with repeated baseline TF determinations, it was observed that a dose of 1.5 g/kg induced slight antinociception only in the AA rats, while 2.0 g/kg produced similar effects in both rat lines. It is thus concluded that the alcohol-preferring AA rats do not show any enhanced alcohol-induced antinociception at relevant alcohol doses. However, the alcohol-avoiding ANA rats appear to have a defective ability to habituate to repeated sensory stimuli, which could contribute to their alcohol avoidance by preventing the development of tolerance to aversive effects of alcohol.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.