Abstract

Abstract Introduction There has been increasing evidence of the efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in improving the hemodynamics, exercise capacity, and biomarkers of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, there is no consensus on the adjustment of home oxygen therapy (HOT) and pulmonary hypertension (PH)-specific medications after BPA in patients with CTEPH. Purpose We aimed to examine the current status of the de-escalation/discontinuation of HOT and PH-specific medications post-BPA, and clarify its effect on subsequent hemodynamics, biomarkers, and long-term clinical outcomes. Methods and results From November 2012 to July 2019, 134 consecutive CTEPH patients who underwent BPA at a single university hospital were enrolled (age; 63.6±13.4 years, female; n=87 [64.9%], WHO functional class [WHO-FC] II/III/IV; 33/92/9). Hemodynamic data, functional capacity (6-minute walk distance and WHO-FC), biomarkers (brain natriuretic peptide [BNP] and high-sensitivity troponin T [hs-TropT]), and respiratory function were evaluated at baseline, immediately and 1 year post-BPA. Clinical outcomes (all-cause death and heart failure [HF] admission) were also assessed during the follow up period. The total number of sessions was 6.3±2.0, and the number of target vessels was 14.3±2.0. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 37.8±11.2 to 20.4±5.1 mmHg 1-year after BPA (p<0.01). The proportion of patients who required HOT (at rest or on exertion) and combination medical therapy (≥2 PH-specific medications) decreased 1 year post-BPA (from 59.0% to 7.5%, and from 41.8% to 10.4%, respectively; Figure). Among 79 patients who required HOT during daytime, 64 patients (81.0%) discontinued HOT just after BPA completion. Among 56 patients who required combination medical therapy, 29 (51.8%) discontinued combination therapy. Baseline factors influencing the continuation of HOT and combination medical therapy post-BPA were almost identical (i.e. lower exercise capacity and pulmonary diffusion capacity, and worse hemodynamics). Results showed that discontinuation of HOT and combination medical therapy did not affect the maintenance of improved hemodynamics and levels of BNP and hs-TropT, and no adverse clinical outcomes (all-cause death and HF hospitalization) were observed during 1 year post-BPA. Conclusions Most CTEPH patients discontinued HOT and PH-specific combination medical therapy after BPA, which was not associated with the deterioration of hemodynamics, functional capacity, or biomarkers. No adverse long-term outcomes were observed. De-escalation/discontinuation of HOT and PH-specific combination medical therapy after BPA is feasible and safe for patients with CTEPH. De-escalation of HOT and medical therapy Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call