Abstract

The development of online justice has led to the emergence of the need for a reasonable assessment of the challenges posed by information technology at the present stage. Advanced technologies make it possible not only to ensure digital litigation in Russia, but also to give it a qualitatively new meaning and procedure for its implementation. The paper reveals artificial intelligence technologies and products of its work that impede the development of online justice in the absence of their proper regulation, including technological one. The rapid and at the same time inevitable introduction into the modern justice system of "new" types of evidence — digital evidence — can negatively affect the objectivity of the court’s conclusions and the distribution of the burden of proof (adversarial nature) between the participants in the process. The study proposes to give a legal assessment to deepfakes and other realistic fakes created by artificial intelligence, which can become a serious obstacle to the development of online justice. The laws of physics, technological progress and information technologies testify, on the one hand, to the unique capabilities of breakthrough technologies, and on the other, to a possible significant change in the traditional institutions of the judicial process and, as a consequence, justice (“law” and “court”). The author proposes solutions to the issues under consideration, making it possible to authenticate the participants in the process and the reliability of electronic evidence using the appropriate technological equipment of the court.

Highlights

  • Перечень возможных доказательств как сведений о фактах процессуальным законодательством строго не закреплен и является открытым[3]

  • The development of online justice has led to the emergence of the need for a reasonable assessment of the challenges posed by information technology at the present stage

  • The paper reveals artificial intelligence technologies and products of its work that impede the development of online justice in the absence of their proper regulation, including technological one

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Перечень возможных доказательств как сведений о фактах процессуальным законодательством строго не закреплен и является открытым[3]. В статье раскрываются технологии искусственного интеллекта и продукты его работы, препятствующие развитию онлайн-правосудия в отсутствие их должной регламентации, в том числе технологической. Стремительное и в то же время неизбежное внедрение в систему современного правосудия «новых» видов доказательств — цифровых доказательств — может негативно повлиять на объективность выводов суда и распределение бремени доказывания (состязательность) между участниками процесса.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.