Deeper Objections to the Privatisation of Military Force

Abstract

THE private military industry has been growing rapidly since the end of the Cold War. Private military and security companies (PMSCs) provide a myriad of services, including the training of troops and security services, the provision of transportation and logistics, and a number of roles more likely to involve direct combat, such as the protection of state officials. The estimates of the size of the industry vary, but most accounts value it at between $20 billion to $200 billion annually per year. The US Department of Defence alone employs 170,000 military contractors, 25,000 of which provide armed services such as personnel, transport and site protection. Given its extent, the increased reliance on PMSCs is often claimed to be one the most significant changes in the military profession over the past three decades.jopp_356 425..447 This privatisation of military force has led to a range of reactions. Some perceive PMSCs to be vital actors in promoting not only states’ interests, but also humanitarianism worldwide. Others view them as part of a ‘dark and distasteful’ industry that enables new opportunities for western colonialist projects. Whilst the potential benefits and disadvantages of using PMSCs are often discussed, the