Abstract

Long standing, recalcitrant venous ulcers fail to heal despite standard compression therapy and wound care. Stenting of central veins has been reported to assist in venous ulcer healing. This study reports outcomes of deep venous stenting for central venous obstruction in patients with recalcitrant venous ulcers at a single comprehensive wound care center. A single center retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with CEAP (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology) 6 disease that had undergone deep venous stenting in addition to wound care and compression therapy. Intra-operative details, wound healing, and stent patency rates were recorded. Stent patency and intra-operative details were compared between the healed and unhealed groups. Between 2010 and 2019, 15 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age: 63 years old, 12 males). Pre-operative mean wound area was 14.1 cm2 with mean wound duration of 30 months. 93% of patients healed the ulcers at mean healing time of 10.6 months. Wound recurrence rate was 57% with mean recurrence time of 14.8 months. Ten patients presented with an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, 4 in the healed group and 6 in the unhealed group. The common iliac vein was stented in all patients. Extension into the IVC was required in 4, the common femoral vein in 11, and femoral vein in 2 patients. The average stent length was 190cm. During the follow-up period, primary patency rates in healed patients (mean follow-up time: 19.2 months) was 83% and 59% in the unhealed group (mean follow-up time: 36.6 months); secondary patency rates were 83% and 89%, respectively. In patients with recalcitrant venous ulcers with central venous obstruction, deep venous stenting resulted in a high rate of healing. However, a prolonged 10 month healing time was observed and despite high stent patency, wound recurrence rate was high.

Highlights

  • Central venous stenting is a common therapy that can alleviate venous hypertension secondary to obstruction

  • Six patients healed without recurrence while 9 patients either did not heal or healed recurred

  • Most of the patients in both groups were on antithrombotic therapy prior to stenting (5 patients in the healed group and 9 patients in the unhealed group)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Central venous stenting is a common therapy that can alleviate venous hypertension secondary to obstruction. In a recent multicenter retrospective view of patients with chronic venous ulcers, those that had undergone deep venous stenting and superficial venous ablation had a wound recurrence rate of 49% at 24 months.[12] there is no consensus among venous specialists, on the optimal treatment algorithm and the sequence of addressing the reflux and obstructive components of venous disease. This study reports outcomes of deep venous stenting for central venous obstruction in patients with recalcitrant venous ulcers at a single comprehensive wound care center. Methods: A single center retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with CEAP (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology) 6 disease that had undergone deep venous stenting in addition to wound care and compression therapy. Conclusions: In patients with recalcitrant venous ulcers with central venous obstruction, deep venous stenting resulted in a high rate of healing. A prolonged 10 month healing time was observed and despite high stent patency, wound recurrence rate was high

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.