Abstract

Strong seasonality in abiotic harshness and pollinator availability shape the reproductive success of plants. Plant species can avoid or can tolerate harsh abiotic conditions and can attract different pollinators, but it remains unknown (i) which of these capacities is most important for flowering phenology, (ii) whether tolerance/avoidance of abiotic harshness reinforces or relaxes the phenological differentiation of species attracting different pollinators. We assembled possibly the first functional trait database for a North African steppe covering 104 species. We inferred avoidance of harshness (drought) from dormancy, i.e. annual life-span and seed size. We inferred tolerance or resistance to harshness from small specific leaf area, small stature, deep roots and high dry matter content. We inferred the type of pollinators attracted from floral colour, shape and depth. We found that avoidance traits did not affect flowering phenology, and among tolerance traits only deep roots had an effect by delaying flowering. Flower colour (red or purple), and occasionally flower depth, delayed flowering. Dish, gullet and flag shape accelerated flowering. Interactive effects however were at least as important, inversing the mentioned relationship between floral characters and flowering phenology. Specifically, among drought-tolerant deep-rooted species, flowering phenologies converged among floral types attracting different pollinators, without becoming less variable overall. Direct and interactive effects of root depth and floral traits explained at least 45% of the variance in flowering phenology. Also, conclusions on interactive effects were highly consistent with and without including information on family identity or outliers. Overall, roots and floral syndromes strongly control flowering phenology, while many other traits do not. Surprisingly, floral syndromes and the related pollinators appear to constrain phenology mainly in shallow-rooted, abiotically little tolerant species. Lack of abiotic tolerance might hence constrain accessible resources and thereby impose a stronger synchronization with biotic partners such as pollinators.

Highlights

  • Flowering phenology is one of the most studied traits in plants as it can strongly influence their reproductive success [1,2,3]

  • One hundred and four of plant species from twenty five families were recorded in this study

  • Results of ANOVA showed that, overall, families had a significant effect on flowering phenology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flowering phenology is one of the most studied traits in plants as it can strongly influence their reproductive success [1,2,3]. Flowering phenology obviously is constrained by the physiological constraints imposed by different seasonal environments. Flowering phenology is constrained by pollinator availability in different environments [6]. Physiological constraints and pollinators do vary among environments, and among species responding differently to abiotic harshness or attracting different pollinator types within the same environment. The question which of these factors— response to abiotic harshness or attractiveness to pollinator types- most strongly affects flowering phenology within a given environment has received limited attention so far [7, 8]. In particular any interactive effects among both factors appear to be unknown

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call