Abstract

Objectives: Deep learning methods have achieved impressive diagnostic performance in the field of radiology. The current study aimed to use deep learning methods to detect caries lesions, classify different radiographic extensions on panoramic films, and compare the classification results with those of expert dentists. Methods: A total of 1160 dental panoramic films were evaluated by three expert dentists. All caries lesions in the films were marked with circles, whose combination was defined as the reference dataset. A training and validation dataset (1071) and a test dataset (89) were then established from the reference dataset. A convolutional neural network, called nnU-Net, was applied to detect caries lesions, and DenseNet121 was applied to classify the lesions according to their depths (dentin lesions in the outer, middle, or inner third D1/2/3 of dentin). The performance of the test dataset in the trained nnU-Net and DenseNet121 models was compared with the results of six expert dentists in terms of the intersection over union (IoU), Dice coefficient, accuracy, precision, recall, negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score metrics. Results: nnU-Net yielded caries lesion segmentation IoU and Dice coefficient values of 0.785 and 0.663, respectively, and the accuracy and recall rate of nnU-Net were 0.986 and 0.821, respectively. The results of the expert dentists and the neural network were shown to be no different in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, NPV, and F1-score. For caries depth classification, DenseNet121 showed an overall accuracy of 0.957 for D1 lesions, 0.832 for D2 lesions, and 0.863 for D3 lesions. The recall results of the D1/D2/D3 lesions were 0.765, 0.652, and 0.918, respectively. All metric values, including accuracy, precision, recall, NPV, and F1-score values, were proven to be no different from those of the experienced dentists. Conclusion: In detecting and classifying caries lesions on dental panoramic radiographs, the performance of deep learning methods was similar to that of expert dentists. The impact of applying these well-trained neural networks for disease diagnosis and treatment decision making should be explored.

Highlights

  • Dental caries are common causes of tooth pain and tooth loss, despite being preventable and treatable

  • Bitewing radiography is the most widely used approach to detect caries lesions and assess their depth, which comes with high sensitivity and specificity [3], it could not perform comprehensive lesions detection of the full mouth in one attempt

  • We focused on dentinal carious decay and divided the entire caries depth into four levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dental caries are common causes of tooth pain and tooth loss, despite being preventable and treatable. Clearly visible tooth cavities induced by caries can be detected by using visual inspection and probing with the use of a dental probe and a handheld mirror. These conventional caries detection methods are effective for partially obscured but accessible caries [1]. Periapical, and bitewing X-rays are three common types of radiographs that are widely used in clinical practice. Bitewing radiography is the most widely used approach to detect caries lesions and assess their depth, which comes with high sensitivity and specificity [3], it could not perform comprehensive lesions detection of the full mouth in one attempt. Due to its relative cost effectiveness and diagnostic evidence, panoramic imaging is considered to be the most common and important radiological tool for clinical dental disease screening, diagnosis, and treatment evaluation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call