Abstract

The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) in differentiating subtle, intermediate, and more obvious image differences in radiography. Three different datasets were created, which included presence/absence of the endotracheal (ET) tube (n = 300), low/normal position of the ET tube (n = 300), and chest/abdominal radiographs (n = 120). The datasets were split into training, validation, and test. Both untrained and pre-trained deep neural networks were employed, including AlexNet and GoogLeNet classifiers, using the Caffe framework. Data augmentation was performed for the presence/absence and low/normal ET tube datasets. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the curves (AUC), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Statistical differences of the AUCs were determined using a non-parametric approach. The pre-trained AlexNet and GoogLeNet classifiers had perfect accuracy (AUC 1.00) in differentiating chest vs. abdominal radiographs, using only 45 training cases. For more difficult datasets, including the presence/absence and low/normal position endotracheal tubes, more training cases, pre-trained networks, and data-augmentation approaches were helpful to increase accuracy. The best-performing network for classifying presence vs. absence of an ET tube was still very accurate with an AUC of 0.99. However, for the most difficult dataset, such as low vs. normal position of the endotracheal tube, DCNNs did not perform as well, but achieved a reasonable AUC of 0.81.

Highlights

  • One of the goals of a trained radiologist is to accurately describe the presence and position of an endotracheal (ET) tube on chest radiography [1]

  • Recent studies using feature extraction and classification with support vector machines have resulted in area under the curves (AUC) of 0.88 and 0.94, respectively, for detection of ET tubes [5, 6]

  • In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) in differentiating subtle, intermediate, and more obvious image differences in radiography

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the goals of a trained radiologist is to accurately describe the presence and position of an endotracheal (ET) tube on chest radiography [1]. Increased mortality and pneumonia have been reported with low positioning of the tube into the bronchi [3]. Recent studies using feature extraction and classification with support vector machines have resulted in area under the curves (AUC) of 0.88 and 0.94, respectively, for detection of ET tubes [5, 6]. One of the goals of this study is to evaluate its efficacy in assessing the presence and location of ET tubes on chest radiographs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.