Abstract

Decisions are made through the integration of external and internal inputs until a threshold is reached, triggering a response. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been implicated in adjusting the decision bound to prevent impulsivity during difficult decisions. We combine model-based and model-free approaches to test the theory that the STN raises the decision bound, a process impaired by deep brain stimulation (DBS). Eight male and female human subjects receiving treatment for Parkinson's disease with bilateral DBS of the STN performed an auditory two-alternative forced choice task. By ending trials unpredictably, we collected reaction time (RT) trials in which subjects reached their decision bound and non-RT trials in which subjects were forced to make a decision with less evidence. A decreased decision bound would cause worse performance on RT trials, and we found this to be the case on left-sided RT trials. Drift diffusion modeling showed a negative drift rate. This implies that in the absence of new evidence, the amount of evidence accumulated tends to drift toward zero. If evidence is accumulated at a constant rate this results in the evidence accumulated reaching an asymptote, the distance of which from the bound was decreased by DBS (p = 0.0079, random shuffle test), preventing subjects from controlling impulsivity. Subjects were more impulsive to bursts of stimuli associated with conflict (p < 0.001, cluster mass test). In addition, DBS lowered the decision bound specifically after error trials, decreasing the probability of switching to a non-RT trial after an error compared to correct response (28% vs. 38%, p = 0.005, Fisher exact test). The STN appears to function in decision-making by modulating the decision bound and drift rate to allow the suppression of impulsive responses.

Highlights

  • The subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been implicating in slowing of decisions, especially those made in the presence of conflicting evidence (Zavala et al, 2015b)

  • Using a two-alternative forced choice perceptual decisionmaking task with both reaction time (RT) and non-RT trials, we found that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the STN does more than decrease the decision bound

  • DBS causes a decrease in accuracy on RT trials but not non-RT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The STN has been implicating in slowing of decisions, especially those made in the presence of conflicting evidence (Zavala et al, 2015b). Conflict increases theta power (Cavanagh et al, 2011; Zavala et al, 2013, 2014) and neuronal firing (Zavala et al, 2015a) in the STN and theta coherence between the STN and mediofrontal areas (Zavala et al, 2014) This activity is reduced when subjects respond quickly despite high levels of conflict, resulting in the hypothesis that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) acts on the STN through the hyperdirect pathway to cause the STN to raise the decision threshold (Frank et al, 2007; Cavanagh et al, 2011)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call