Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and compare it with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in keratoconic eyes with Descemet membrane (DM) rupture. In this comparative retrospective case series, 33 keratoconic eyes with a history of hydrops underwent DALK and 27 received PKP. Baseline and postoperative visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, mean keratometry, endothelial cell density, and complication rates were measured. The median follow-up of patients who underwent DALK was 45 months (range, 4-76 months) and that of patients who underwent PKP was 84 months (range, 4-136 months). Both procedures had comparable postoperative visual acuity, astigmatism, and mean keratometry. Significantly higher endothelial cell densities were observed in DALK than in PKP at 2, 3, and 5 years postsurgery (2043 ± 767 vs. 1165 ± 683 cell/mm 2 , P = 0.007, n = 12 in both groups at 2 years). Intra-DALK, 15 perforations occurred (44.12%) and 1 (2.94%) was converted to PKP. Graft rejection was diagnosed in 1 (3.03%) DALK procedure versus 8 (29.63%) PKP ( P = 0.008), and other long-term complication rates were equivalent. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis also revealed a higher rejection-free survival rate for the DALK group ( P = 0.012). Subgroup analysis within both groups based on the severity of preoperative DM rupture revealed no significant difference in any major 2-year outcomes. DALK showed similar beneficial visual outcome and safety but significantly better endothelial protection over PKP in eyes with keratoconus and previous hydrops. Therefore, DALK is recommended in posthydrops cases irrespective of the DM rupture severity.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.