Abstract

When school buildings across the U.S. closed in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many school districts mobilized to establish emer­gency school meal programs to operate outside the setting of school cafeterias. The aim of this conver­gent mixed-methods study is to (a) examine the structure and rates of participation in the spring 2020 meal programs in Connecticut, and (b) obtain insight about the challenges, strategies used, and lessons learned during this time by food service leaders. We obtained quantitative data from the Connecticut State Department of Education and district websites, and qualitative data from nine one-hour interviews with school food service lead­ers. Although the National School Lunch Program provides meals at standard price, reduced-price, or no cost based on student household income, all emergency meals during spring 2020 were provided at no cost following the school closures resulting from the COVID-19 public health emergency dec­lara­tion. The average number of meals distrib­uted from March to May 2020 was significantly lower than the overall participation rates (i.e., paid, free, and reduced-price meals combined) prior to COVID-19. However, participation rates in April and May 2020 approached those of free and reduced-price meal participation a year earlier. Four key action themes emerged from the interviews: (1) tailor the program to community needs and resources; (2) identify strategies to facilitate partici­pation; (3) develop partnerships to coordinate school, municipal, and community efforts; and (4) establish programs that encourage resiliency. The interviewees also saw this event as an oppor­tunity to improve the perception of school meals. Inno­vations developed during the spring 2020 school building closures provide a road map for best prac­tices for the 2020–2021 school year and beyond.

Highlights

  • Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, one in seven American households with children was food insecure, defined as having limited access to adequate food due to a lack of money and other resources (Coleman-Jensen, Rabbitt, Gregory, & Singh, 2020)

  • The U.S Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) federal child nutrition programs are a critical part of the safety net to support child food security, and the largest of these programs, the National School Lunch Program (NSLP), serves roughly 29.6 million students daily (USDA Economic Research Service, n.d.)

  • With the emergence of COVID-19 and the resultant school closures in March 2020, millions of students were at risk of losing access to school meals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, one in seven American households with children was food insecure, defined as having limited access to adequate food due to a lack of money and other resources (Coleman-Jensen, Rabbitt, Gregory, & Singh, 2020). The U.S Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) federal child nutrition programs are a critical part of the safety net to support child food security, and the largest of these programs, the National School Lunch Program (NSLP), serves roughly 29.6 million students daily (USDA Economic Research Service, n.d.). School meals must meet strong federal nutrition standards (Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs, 2012), and participation in the school meal program has been found to reduce children’s food insecurity and improve the quality of their diet (Cullen and Chen, 2017; Ralston, Treen, Coleman-Jensen, & Guthrie, 2017). There are a variety of regulatory differences between the summer programs and the NSLP, most notably that all meals are served at no cost regardless of family income level (Connecticut State Department of Education, n.d.-a, n.d.-b)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call