Abstract

PurposePurpose of this study is to re-evaluate the accuracy and diagnostic reliability of virtual non-contrast (VNC) images acquired with the photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) after an update of the CT scanner software. MethodsFifty-four patients were retrospectively enrolled. VNC images were reconstructed from true non-contrast (TNC) images (VNCn) and contrast-enhanced images in portal venous contrast phase (VNCv). Additionally, a liver-specific VNC (VNCl) was assessed. Quantitative image properties of VNC and TNC images were compared and consistency between VNC images was evaluated. Regions of interest were drawn in the liver, spleen, renal cortex, aorta, muscle and subcutaneous fat. ResultsAttenuation values on all VNC images differed significantly from TNC images in the liver, renal cortex, aorta and fat. A mean offset of <10HU between TNC and all VNC images was found in the liver, spleen and muscle. The comparison of TNC and VNCl images revealed an offset < 10HU in fat. Differences ≤ 10HU between TNC and VNCv and between TNC and VNCl were found in 68%, respectively in 75%. Differences ≤ 15HU were found in 79%, respectively in 92% of all measurements. Differences ≤ 10HU between TNC and VNCn were found in 79% and differences ≤ 15HU in 85%. ConclusionAlthough there are statistically significant differences between HU values measured on TNC and VNC images in certain tissues, the minor offsets measured in liver and spleen suggest a good clinical applicability of VNCv and VNCl images. The significantly lower offset in subcutaneous fat on VNCl images suggests a superiority for measurements in adipose tissues.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call