Abstract

Without new innovations, present rates of increase in yields of food crops globally are inadequate to meet the projected rising food demand for 2050 and beyond. A prevailing response of crops to rising [CO 2] is an increase in leaf area. This is especially marked in soybean, the world's fourth largest food crop in terms of seed production, and the most important vegetable protein source. Is this increase in leaf area beneficial, with respect to increasing yield, or is it detrimental? It is shown from theory and experiment using open‐air whole‐season elevation of atmospheric [CO 2] that it is detrimental not only under future conditions of elevated [CO 2] but also under today's [CO 2]. A mechanistic biophysical and biochemical model of canopy carbon exchange and microclimate (MLCan) was parameterized for a modern US Midwest soybean cultivar. Model simulations showed that soybean crops grown under current and elevated (550 [ppm]) [CO 2] overinvest in leaves, and this is predicted to decrease productivity and seed yield 8% and 10%, respectively. This prediction was tested in replicated field trials in which a proportion of emerging leaves was removed prior to expansion, so lowering investment in leaves. The experiment was conducted under open‐air conditions for current and future elevated [CO 2] within the Soybean Free Air Concentration Enrichment facility (SoyFACE) in central Illinois. This treatment resulted in a statistically significant 8% yield increase. This is the first direct proof that a modern crop cultivar produces more leaf than is optimal for yield under today's and future [CO 2] and that reducing leaf area would give higher yields. Breeding or bioengineering for lower leaf area could, therefore, contribute very significantly to meeting future demand for staple food crops given that an 8% yield increase across the USA alone would amount to 6.5 million metric tons annually.

Highlights

  • Rising global population coupled with dietary change in emerging economies is predicted to increase global demand for staple food crops 50% by 2030 (Ainsworth et al, 2012), and 70–100% by 2050 (Alexandratos & Bruinsma, 2012; Tilman & Clark, 2015)

  • Comparing the model-estimated canopy light use efficiency (LUE) between the predicted optimum leaf area index (LAI) and the observed LAI, we find that the LUE is higher under optimal LAI by 9% and 7% under current and elevated [CO2], respectively (Fig. 4a)

  • The combined model and experimental results show that a modern soybean cultivar appears to produce far more leaves than necessary to the detriment of yield, a trend that appears to rise with rising [CO2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A near universal response of plants grown under forecast future elevated [CO2] is an increase in investment in leaves, shown by increased leaf biomass, area, and leaf area index (LAI), that is, the amount of leaf area per unit ground area (Ainsworth & Long, 2005). Biochemical and biophysical principles are used to model and understand whether reduction in leaf area would (1) change total net carbon gain by the crop, that is, net primary production (NPP), and (2) by forcing decreased investment in leaf construction cause a yield increase under current and elevated [CO2]. These predictions were tested experimentally, by artificially removing developing leaves, in replicated field trials, under open-air conditions of current and elevated [CO2] (550 ppm) within the SoyFACE facility (Long et al, 2006)

Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call