Abstract

PurposeSentinel-lymph-node (SLN) biopsy (SLB) is an efficient and safe axillary surgical approach with decreased morbidity than total axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in initial patients (T1–T2). Current guidelines strongly suggest avoiding completion of ALND in patients with one or two positive SLNs that will be submitted to whole-breast radiation therapy, but must be done when three SLNs are affected.MethodsWe performed a SEER-based study with breast invasive ductal carcinoma patients treated between 2010 and 2015. Optimal cutoffs of positive LNs predictive of survival were obtained with ROC curves and survival as a continuous variable. Bias was reduced through propensity score matching. Cox regression was employed to estimate prognosis. Nomograms were constructed to analyze the predictive value of clinicopathological factors for axillary burden.ResultsOf 43,239 initial patients that had one to three analyzed LNs, only 425 had two positive LNs and matched analysis demonstrated no survival difference versus pN2 patients [HR: 0.960 (0.635–1.452), p = 0.846]. The positive-to-analyzed LN proportion demonstrated a strong prognostic factor for a low rate (1 positive to ≤1.5 analyzed) [HR = 1.567 (1.156–2.126), p = 0.004], and analysis derived from the results demonstrated that a “negative LN margin” improves survival. Nomograms shows that tumor size is the main factor of axillary burden.ConclusionMacrometastasis of two LNs is a poor prognostic factor, similar to pN2, in SLNB (-like) patients; more extensive studies including preconized therapies must be done in order to corroborate or refute the resistance of this prognostic difference in patients with two macrometastatic lymph nodes within few resected.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIn initial (T1–T2) breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has proven safe and not inferior compared to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and should be considered the standard of care in those patients due to its reduced resultant morbidity [1]

  • In initial (T1–T2) breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has proven safe and not inferior compared to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and should be considered the standard of care in those patients due to its reduced resultant morbidity [1].Negativity of all SLNs, irrespective of how many are resected, has been extensively proven to have similar prognosis to the ALND approach, discarding completing ALND in those patients

  • A strong association was observed between SLNBL and pN0 compared to non-SLNBL [OR = 8.088 (7.706– 8.488), p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In initial (T1–T2) breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has proven safe and not inferior compared to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and should be considered the standard of care in those patients due to its reduced resultant morbidity [1]. Negativity of all SLNs, irrespective of how many are resected, has been extensively proven to have similar prognosis to the ALND approach, discarding completing ALND in those patients. Current guidelines recommend omission of ALND completion in patients with one or two macrometastatic SLNs with planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole-breast irradiation [2]. Based on the SEER database, this study analyzed the prognostic role of two macrometastatic lymph nodes (LNs), according to the number of resected LNs, to assess possible biasing of current management

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.