Abstract

In sequence stratigraphic interpretations, the key premise is that stratal surfaces effectively represent geologic timelines. When applied to seismic sections, the fundamental assumption is that primary reflections generally mimic stratigraphic timelines. The main objective of this study was to test how well key reflectors in a seismic section couple to timelines. To achieve the high level of ground control needed for such testing, we combined photogrammetry and traditional sedimentologic fieldwork to optimize the geologic model. We relied further on petrophysical analysis to derive a numerical model suitable for the simulation of seismic data. In spite of laterally discontinuous vertical-impedance contrasts (VICs), false seismic continuity was created, and we observed frequent decoupling of seismic reflectors and stratigraphic timelines. These observations demonstrate how the low-frequency seismic method fails to image normal complexity in a stratigraphic unit. A seismic correlation test showed that the interpreters made numerous mistakes and that such mistakes are very difficult to avoid. The failure of a fundamental assumption, as illustrated here, creates serious problems for the sequence stratigraphic concept when applied to detailed correlation analysis on seismic sections.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call