Abstract

Grassland restoration is largely focused on creating plant communities that match reference conditions. However, these communities reflect only a subset of the biodiversity of grassland systems. We conducted a multi-trophic study to assess ecosystem recovery following energy development for oil and gas extraction in northern US Great Plains rangelands. We compared soil factors, plant species composition and cover, and nematode trophic structuring between reclaimed oil and gas well sites (“reclaims”) that comprise a chronosequence of two—33 years since reclamation and adjacent, undeveloped rangeland at distances of 50 m and 150 m from reclaim edges. Soils and plant communities in reclaims did not match those on undeveloped rangeland even after 33 years. Reclaimed soils had higher salt concentrations and pH than undeveloped soils. Reclaims had lower overall plant cover, a greater proportion of exotic and ruderal plant cover and lower native plant species richness than undeveloped rangeland. However, nematode communities appear to have recovered following reclamation. Although total and omni-carnivorous nematode abundances differed between reclaimed well sites and undeveloped rangeland, community composition and structure did not. These findings suggest that current reclamation practices recover the functional composition of nematode communities, but not soil conditions or plant communities. Our results show that plant communities have failed to recover through reclamation: high soil salinity may create a persistent impediment to native plant growth and ecosystem recovery.

Highlights

  • Restoration of human-degraded landscapes aims to recover ecological communities and their functions, and is critical for sustainable ecosystem management (Hobbs & Harris, 2001)

  • ANOVA testing (Table 1) revealed that total plant species richness was lower on reclaims compared to undeveloped rangeland, driven by lower native plant species richness on reclaims (Fig. 2A)

  • Nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling (NMS) ordination of plant community species composition revealed clear differences between communities associated with reclaims and those associated with undeveloped rangeland, which PERMANOVA analysis revealed to be significant (P = 0.003 for both native prairie locations compared with reclaims)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Restoration of human-degraded landscapes aims to recover ecological communities and their functions, and is critical for sustainable ecosystem management (Hobbs & Harris, 2001). Conventional restoration focuses on reestablishing the most common members of the plant community (Suding, 2011), setting the stage for natural colonization of the area by other taxa (i.e., the ‘‘field of dreams’’ paradigm; Hilderbrand, Watts & Randle, 2005). Restoration is intended to eventually reflect reference (e.g., undisturbed and natural) ecosystems, while reclamation may only restore a subset of reference conditions. Most studies of reclamation focus on individual ecosystem components; a multi-trophic. How to cite this article Sylvain ZA, Branson DH, Rand TA, West NM, Espeland EK. Decoupled recovery of ecological communities after reclamation.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call