Abstract

The pendant from Luka-Kavetchyna, dwelling 25 (fig. 2: 1; 3) is the earliest find from the Slavs sites da­ting to the second quarter — the end of the 5th century. The adornment was made of a shell of the genus Murex and is the «legacy» from the Cherniakhіv culture. In the area of that culture are known the pendants made of shells of this genus (type 2 by O. Hopkalo).
 The pendants from shells appear in use of the Slavs since the second half of the 6th century. Their varieties were used until the first half of the 8th century, although the assemblages and finds with them are few (table 1; fig. 1; 14). In the Slavic assemblages the shells of mollusks of the following species were occurred: Cypraea moneta, C. pantherina, C. tigris, C. arabica. The items from Murex shells are also known. The height of Cypraea moneta is a little more than 2 cm. Other species of shells are larger reaching the height ca. 7—8 cm.
 The assemblages of the Martinіvka circle include Khatski (fig. 4: A) and Khittsі ones. The grave from Mokhnach belongs to the same antiquities (fig. 2: 2; 5—7). The jewellery by Martynivka circle are dated back to the second half of the 6th century, and the hoards were hidden in the middle — the third quarter of the 7th century. The Pastyrsky circle hoards include the assemblages from Zaitsevo (fig. 4: B) and Kharіvka (fig. 8—10). The hoards by Pastyrsky circle were hidden in the first half of 8th century.
 The appearance of the pendants from shells is related to the general trend of the spread of Cypraea moneta in Eastern Europe in the early Middle Ages. They are known in the Caucasus, Crimea, the Seversky Donets basin (fig. 11). Cypraea moneta shells were used as pendants in necklaces as evidenced by finds from the Luchiste burial ground from Crimea. The use of other types of shells remains unclear. However, they were probably parts of necklaces or amulets.

Highlights

  • В жіночий костюм входили фібули, браслети та великий спектр деталей намиста (Щеглова 1999; Родинкова 2011)

  • виявлених у складі кількох дніпровських скарбів першої й другої хронологічних груп за О. О. Щегловою

  • the earliest find from the Slavs sites da­ ting to the second quarter

Read more

Summary

АМ ІА НАН України

Вакуленко, Приходнюк 1984a, с. 71, 81, рис. 31; 38: 12; 1984b, с. 43; 1985, с. 83. Cypraea др. пол. pantherina VI — тр. Бобринский 1901, НМІУ — скар- с. XIV; бниця НМІУ; Корзухина 1996, мушля втра- с. Умовні позначення: І — Cypraea pantherina; ІІ — C. tigris; ІІІ — C. arabica; IV — Murex sp.; V — C. moneta; VI — Murex; VІI — коралові намистини. Пам’ятки: 1 — Лука-Каветчина; 2 — Хацьки; 3 — Хитці; 4 — Мохнач; 5 — Зайців; 6 — Харівка; 7 — Любовка; 8 — Гапонове; 9 — Суджа-Замостьє; — Пастирське; — Коропові Хутори лено співробітниками музею при опрацюванні матеріалів колекції скарбу. Однак у фондових книгах знахідка записана просто як мушля без визначення. В. Прикраси із мушель у вбранні ранньосередньовічних слов’ян. 2. Комплекси із мушлями: 1 — Лука-Каветчина, житло 25; 2 — Мохнач, поховання, профілі стінок ями. Умовні позначення: І — ями; ІІ — каміння; ІІІ — черінь печі та вогнища; IV — чорнозем; V — засипка могильної ями; VI — материк; VII — зруйнований звід підбою; VIII — дерев’яний тлін

Хитцівський скарб
Decorations from shells in the adornments of early medieval Slavs
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.