Abstract
Multiple phosphorus-containing compounds were evaluated as electrolyte additives for their reactivity at the cathode surface using LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 (NMC532) // Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) cells with both cycling and high voltage potentiostatic holds. We surveyed additives including phosphite and phosphate derivatives with either trifluoroethyl, ethyl, or trimethylsilyl groups. Phosphite additives with the same substituents showed lower Coulombic efficiency (CE) and higher oxidation current during the potentiostatic hold. Regardless of substitution group, all phosphates showed slightly higher CE than the additive-free electrolyte (baseline). However, no additive significantly decreases oxidation reactions over the course of the potentiostatic hold, indicating a non-passivated surface. Post-mortem X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of the cathodes indicates that the additive with trimethylsilyl groups produces significantly more oxygen and phosphorus on the cathode surface for both phosphites and phosphates. Atomistic simulations indicate that these additives are susceptible to electrochemical and chemical oxidation, however chemical oxidation is much more likely for the phosphite additives. The identity of ligands on the phosphorus-containing additive can dramatically affect both the decomposition current and the cathode surface after the potentiostatic hold.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.