Abstract

This study follows the structure of Grifell-Tatje and Lovell (Manag Sci 45:1177–1193, 1999) and uses the non-parametric approach to decompose the change in profit of Taiwanese banks into various drivers. However, risk was never considered in the papers based on profit decomposition. Without considering risk, the empirical results will be biased while decomposing the change in profit. In fact, risk is a joint but undesirable output which cannot be freely disposed of by various regulations. The non-performing loan (NPL) is employed as a risk indicator for decomposing the change in profit in this study. This study also performs a three-way comparison among (1) the original Grifell-Tatje and Lovell (Manag Sci 45:1177–1193, 1999) analysis (OGLA) model that ignores NPL, (2) the extended Grifell-Tatje and Lovell (Manag Sci 45:1177–1193, 1999) analysis (EGLA) model that is based on the OGLA model and incorporates NPL, and (3) the directional distance function (DDF) model that is based on Juo et al. (Omega 40:550–561, 2012) and incorporates NPLs to see if incorporating the undesirable output matters. The decomposition of the change in profit in the above three models is then illustrated using Taiwanese banks over the period 2006–2010.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.